Beginning with a couple (Andrzej and Krystyna) driving a car on a narrow road in countryside, stopped by a hitchhiker. They decided to take him with them and they took this young man to their sailing trip. Everything seems good but the situation changed when Andrzej found his wife and the young man talking while he slept. He got mad at them two and began to the provoke young guy and finally dropped his knife into the water. The young man was extremely angry and fought with Andrzej. The young man fell into water and disappeared, which made Krystyna thought he dead and thus she blamed Andrzej for killing the young man. Andrzej consequently jumped into water to look for the young guy. However, the young man did not die and instead he climbed on the boat, making sex with Krystyna and left. Krystyna navigated back to the harbor and Andrzej was waiting her there. He wanted to drive to the police office and the film ended up with the scene that the car stopped at the sign which written with "10 miles from the police office."
For the content, Knife in the Water is a typical art film because of its ambiguous storyline. It is hard to tell the protagonists and the antagonists in the films and the main roles lack a clear goal to achieve. It seems like the director just followed what was happening during the whole trip, using his own povs to perceive the whole world and film what he perceived from the world around him. The ambiguous ending also illustrates the director's personal choice, which gives audiences a broad imagination to think about what's going on. Or what if the most important of the film is not whether the couple went to the police office, but what's going on in the film and how the actors react to all the randoms happened to them.
In the technique respect, the filmmakers utilized a more "documentary" format to express the whole film due to the considerable location shooting within the whole film. Also, the deep focuses which were in the films are also great. Moreover, the composition is another good part of this film. For example, when the young man came closer to Andrzej, the shot of Andrzej's legs composed a perfect triangle. It is not hard to see that the director was trying to use the camera to make the audiences follow his povs. All the delicate design track shooting is very elegant and fluent, such as the boat sailing in the lake.
Knife In the Water exemplified how art film illustrated a filmmaker's perception towards the world and how he conveyed his perception into films, taking a giant leap which influenced mainstream films a lot in the future. Art cinema, as an increasingly important film style in post war era, began to draw more and more attentions from the mainstream.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Ladri di biciclette
Bicycle thieves, an Italian Neorealism film which is directed by Vittorio De Sica, is a very impressed and influential film as long as it was screened. It is a significant cinematic artwork in the postwar era not only because it contained several new trends of postwar films and changed the way people regarded films, but also because it drew worldwide audiences' attentions towards to the hard time and bad situations that the whole European people went through after the WWII.
As a film in which the director utilized less film skills and kept it as real as possible, the term "realism" went into audiences' eyes more often than ever before. In the films, the actors were not professional ones, giving the film a sense of reality that made audiences feel like the film was like their daily life. Also, the filmmakers tried not to use so much reverse shots or montage, which made the film more "documentary". Instead of giving audiences a specific and small frame, the directors made more long shots and long takes to enlarge audiences' views and consequently rejected the subjectivity that filmmakers often gave to audiences.
The film focused on the three-days life of a normal family in the after war Italy, where there was high unemployment and people went through a tough period. In the family, the husband was unemployed for a long time and finally got a job from the welfare department. However, the requirement was he had to have a bicycle. Selling the bed sheets, the man bought a bicycle and went to work happily. Unfortunately, his bicycle was stolen in his first working day so as he had no money to buy a new one, he had to find it or he would lose the job.
What happened afterward was the most interesting part because although he did the best to find the bicycle with his son, there were several obstacles which blocked him from finding it. He found an old guy who knew how to contact the thief, however, the old guy was so callous that he only thought about himself. He did not want to offer the guy's address even though he lost nothing from it. From my pov, this part was interesting because it represented how cold and scared people were in that era. They only cared about themselves and even others might die, they did not care at all. The humanities shown here made me pretty sad because it was not the problem of the old guy, it was the problem of the whole society after the war. People never trusted others and they became extremely selfish in the extreme impoverished situations. Also, there was another plot which interested me a lot. When the man finally found the thief, all the neighborhood rejected him and stopped him from taking his bicycle back or asking the young thief, which made the thief seemed like not that bad, or he wouldn't win so much supports. Conversely, the man who was stolen the bicycle, also went to steal another one's bicycle, which made it like a recycle system that everyone was no good or bad. People were just determined by the life conditions they experienced.
As a Academy Award winner, Bicycle Thieves provides a new view of what we should shoot in the film and what filmmakers should consider about. It was this new trend which made a explosive influence and discussion around the whole world.
As a film in which the director utilized less film skills and kept it as real as possible, the term "realism" went into audiences' eyes more often than ever before. In the films, the actors were not professional ones, giving the film a sense of reality that made audiences feel like the film was like their daily life. Also, the filmmakers tried not to use so much reverse shots or montage, which made the film more "documentary". Instead of giving audiences a specific and small frame, the directors made more long shots and long takes to enlarge audiences' views and consequently rejected the subjectivity that filmmakers often gave to audiences.
The film focused on the three-days life of a normal family in the after war Italy, where there was high unemployment and people went through a tough period. In the family, the husband was unemployed for a long time and finally got a job from the welfare department. However, the requirement was he had to have a bicycle. Selling the bed sheets, the man bought a bicycle and went to work happily. Unfortunately, his bicycle was stolen in his first working day so as he had no money to buy a new one, he had to find it or he would lose the job.
What happened afterward was the most interesting part because although he did the best to find the bicycle with his son, there were several obstacles which blocked him from finding it. He found an old guy who knew how to contact the thief, however, the old guy was so callous that he only thought about himself. He did not want to offer the guy's address even though he lost nothing from it. From my pov, this part was interesting because it represented how cold and scared people were in that era. They only cared about themselves and even others might die, they did not care at all. The humanities shown here made me pretty sad because it was not the problem of the old guy, it was the problem of the whole society after the war. People never trusted others and they became extremely selfish in the extreme impoverished situations. Also, there was another plot which interested me a lot. When the man finally found the thief, all the neighborhood rejected him and stopped him from taking his bicycle back or asking the young thief, which made the thief seemed like not that bad, or he wouldn't win so much supports. Conversely, the man who was stolen the bicycle, also went to steal another one's bicycle, which made it like a recycle system that everyone was no good or bad. People were just determined by the life conditions they experienced.
As a Academy Award winner, Bicycle Thieves provides a new view of what we should shoot in the film and what filmmakers should consider about. It was this new trend which made a explosive influence and discussion around the whole world.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Rashomon, an art film about humanism
In postwar era, the development of modernist art and the influence the war brought to people, culturally and socially affect the emergence of art cinema. During this period cinema does not any more have the straight storyline and characters do not have clear-cut persona any longer. Oppositely, filmmakers were trying to search another way to express their inner thought with camera, using multiple-persona characters and complex structure of storyline.
At this point, Rashomon is a good example to illustrate this occurrence, by using parallel storyline to tell a story about complexity and selfishness of humanity. Everyone in this film is a representation of deceit and feign. For example, the robbery lies because he wants to seem strong enough and show his masculinity; the woman lies because she wants to keep an image of her innocence and her faith to her husband; the man lies because he wants to let others respect and honor him after he died; the witness lies because he stole the expensive dagger. As a result, there are four stories of the same affair, which shocked the Buddha and the witness, simultaneously shocking the audiences and showing the fact that people are selfish creatures. If the deepest humanism is dig out and shown in front of people, it is hard to accept the coldness of the fact.
However, at the end of the film, the positive aspect humanism is shown since the witness' adoption of the kid. The hope is lit up again when the heavy rain stopped, and maybe the kid is the representation of the new generation of Japanese after World War II, hope and bright future.
At this point, Rashomon is a good example to illustrate this occurrence, by using parallel storyline to tell a story about complexity and selfishness of humanity. Everyone in this film is a representation of deceit and feign. For example, the robbery lies because he wants to seem strong enough and show his masculinity; the woman lies because she wants to keep an image of her innocence and her faith to her husband; the man lies because he wants to let others respect and honor him after he died; the witness lies because he stole the expensive dagger. As a result, there are four stories of the same affair, which shocked the Buddha and the witness, simultaneously shocking the audiences and showing the fact that people are selfish creatures. If the deepest humanism is dig out and shown in front of people, it is hard to accept the coldness of the fact.
However, at the end of the film, the positive aspect humanism is shown since the witness' adoption of the kid. The hope is lit up again when the heavy rain stopped, and maybe the kid is the representation of the new generation of Japanese after World War II, hope and bright future.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Cry of the city
I saw a very good movie today, Cry of the City, which is screened in 1948. I like the structure of the film because the storyline represents the darkness of Italian immigrants, which has strong sense of ethnicity. Also, the ending of the film is very unforgettable because it represents that people do not give up their dreams and hopes and they still not give up each other.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Hello everyone~
This is my new blog and I will public some reviews of films I like on it. Hopefully you will like it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)